Why mediation? Mediation can be a beneficial alternative dispute resolution method with pros and cons.
Pros of Mediation
Voluntary and Informal Mediation is usually voluntary, and parties participate willingly. It’s less formal than litigation or arbitration, which can make it less intimidating and more conducive to open dialogue.
Control and Empowerment: Parties have more control over the outcome. They actively participate in crafting solutions rather than having a decision imposed on them by a judge or arbitrator.
Preserves Relationships: Mediation often focuses on preserving relationships, particularly valuable in family disputes, business partnerships, or community conflicts.
Confidentiality: The process is confidential, which means that discussions and agreements reached in mediation can generally not be used in court if mediation fails.
Cost-Effective and Timely: Mediation can be less expensive and faster than litigation. It avoids the lengthy court procedures and backlog.
Flexibility: Mediation can address legal issues and underlying interests and concerns, allowing for more creative and customised solutions. Cons of Mediation
Cons of Mediation
No Guaranteed Resolution: Mediation does not guarantee a resolution to the dispute. If the parties cannot agree, they may still be in litigation or arbitration.
Power Imbalance: In cases of a significant power imbalance between the parties (e.g., employer-employee disputes), mediation might not always ensure fairness.
Dependence on Cooperation: Mediation relies on both parties being willing to negotiate and cooperate. Mediation may be ineffective if one party is unwilling to engage in good faith.
Lack of Legal Enforcement: Unlike court judgments or arbitration awards, mediated agreements are not enforceable until converted into a legally binding contract.
Complex Cases: In complex legal disputes involving multiple parties or intricate legal issues, mediation might not be sufficient to address all aspects comprehensively.
Limited Remedies: Mediation typically focuses on reaching a compromise or settlement. It may not provide remedies that a court or arbitrator could award, such as punitive damages.